Samhudi Samhudi


This research was conducted to find out the students errors in distinguishing between collective and plural noun and the factors made the students errors in distinguishing between collective noun and plural noun. In collecting required data, the researcher used interview and test. The subject of this research was the students at class VII2 SMPN 1 Nisam which consisted of 29 students. The result of this research shown that the students errors were divided into three categories, namely, errors of omission, errors of addition and errors of misuse. Based on the result of test, it was found out that there were 10,7% of students made errors of omission, 67,4% errors of misuse and 21,9 % errors of addition. The result of interview shown that students made many errors caused by two factors; they are external and internal factor. External factor come from the method of teaching, because how well the students understand the material depends on the method of teaching that used by the teacher. Internal factor was the students themselves, they did not pay attention to their study, some of them were afraid and shy to ask the teacher if they do not understand the material. Some of them were did not do repetition of their lesson or lazy to study.


Keywords: Error, Collective and Plural Noun

Full Text:



Barbara, Dykes. 2007. Grammar for Everyone: Practical Tools for Learning and Teaching Grammar. Australia: Acer Press.

Brown, H Douglas. 1980. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. The United State of America: University of Illinois.

Burhan, Bungin. 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Putra Grafika.

Collins, Cobuild. 2003. English Grammar. London: Harper Collins Publishers.

Corder, S.P. 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Corder, S. P, The Significance of Learners’ Errors, in Douglas, Brown, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, (The United State of America: University of Illinois, 1980)

Cramer, Ronald; Linda; Crhis . 1984. Language Structure and Use. New York: The United Stated of America.

Cyssco, Dhanny. 2007. English Grammar Practice for TOEFL. Jakarta: Puspa Suara.

Dulay, Heidi. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.

Estenberg and Kristin G. 2002. Qualitative Method in Social Research. New York: Mc Grow Hill, in Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R & D. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Eugene, Ehrlich. 2004. Teori dan Soal Latihan English Grammar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ellis, Rod. 1985. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Heaton, J.B. 1989. Writing English Language Tests. New York: Longman.

Kessemal, Judi and Peterson Franklynn. 1982. The Grammar Crammer: How to Write Perfect Sentences. The United States of America: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Knapp, Peter and Megan, Watkins. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Australia: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.

Komaruddin & Tjuparmah, Yooke. 2006. Kamus Istilah Karya Tulis Ilmiah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Leech, Geoffrey, Margareth, D, and Robert, H. 1982. English Grammar for Today. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Michael & Mary Ellen. 2005. Cliffs TOEFL Preparation Guide, Test of English as A Foreign Language. New Delhi: Wiley Dreamtech India.

Quirk, Randolph. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of The English Language. New York: Longman.

Rangkuti, S, Hasibuan. 2000. English Language Structure. A Complete Reference Book. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Ridwansyah. 2006. Mastering English Grammar. Jakarta: Puspa Suara.

Sukmadinata, Nana. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Swan, Michael. 1995. Practical English Usage. New York: Oxford University Press.

Syamsuddin and Vismaia Damaianti. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Thomson & Martinet. 1986. A Practical English Grammar. New York: Oxford University Express.

Article Metrics

Abstract views: 145   PDF views: 161